Thursday, July 23, 2020
Have we forgotten how to talk to each other - Viewpoint Viewpoint careers advice blog
Have we forgotten how to talk to each other - Viewpoint Before you read on, take a look around your office â" how many people are actually talking to each other? Iâd hasten to guess that most are plugged into their earphones, or beavering away behind their computer screens, probably emailing the person that sits opposite them. Am I right? Typing has become our default communication mode In the race to innovate and implement new technology, the digitalisation of the way we work has never been faster. But is this domination of technology in our lives getting us out of the habit of communicating using one of our most powerful tools our voices? I think it is, and as a result, Iâm concerned that the hugely valuable art of spoken communication is being lost in our workplaces simply because we donât have the opportunity, or even the inclination to talk to each other enough. After all, itâs far easier to send a bulk email to ten people, than it is to call them all individually or initiate face-to-face meetings. Instead, most of us are spending our working days contributing to the 269 billion emails and 65 billion WhatsApp messages sent every day, sparingly picking up the phone, or meeting in person to have a conversation. Typing is now our default, go-to mode of communication and our keyboards are the facilitators â" usually out of convenience and speed, but mainly because weâre on auto-pilot. Why we need to talk more, and type less Iâve said this before, but the human touch (including our voices) just canât be replicated by technology. Yes, email or Skype messaging might be quicker and easier, but these forms of communication usually arenât as effective as the spoken word â" and thatâs what many of us just donât realise. So, hereâs why I think we should be encouraging our workforces to talk more and type less: Talking is usually more productive It sounds counter-intuitive, especially when weâre told all the time that using technology will help us become more productive (and much of it does), but thatâs not always the case when weâre trying to communicate to get work done quickly and efficiently. Email is a productivity zapper, itâs a fact. Many of us focus incessantly on emptying our inboxes every day to make us feel more productive and efficient, when really, the opposite is happening. In fact, research has shown that â62% of emails in the average inbox arenât important and can be processed in bulkâ. As such, this obsession with email often serves as a diversionary tactic, taking our attention away from the higher-value projects, and higher-value conversations we really should be focusing on. Whatâs more, with more of us sending and receiving more emails than ever before, itâs no wonder that itâs not the most effective communication tool. We just canât keep up, and as a result, the âSorry for the delayed responseâ line is becoming a common fixture in most of our inboxes. However, using our voices to communicate, ask a question or provide a brief for an urgent task is far more likely to elicit, a). an actual response, and b). a quicker response. In fact, after one person has spoken, the other replies in an average of just 200 milliseconds, compared to an email or WhatsApp message that can get swallowed into a black hole, never to be read, let alone replied to. But itâs not just speed of response which makes voice a productive form of communication. Itâs the fact that this response will probably be more useful. For instance, research published in the Journal of Social Psychology, found that many people tend to âoverestimate the power of their persuasiveness via text-based communication, and underestimate the power of their persuasiveness via face-to-face communication.â In fact, a face-to-face request is 34 times more successful than email. Plus, Iâm willing to bet that you can talk faster than you can type! Talking to each other develops a stronger rapport Itâs almost impossible to build up a productive rapport over email or via digital messaging â" no matter how many emojiâs you use. You just canât get a real feel for the person behind the keyboard without actually hearing their voice. This couldnât be truer than in the world of recruitment. Yes, itâs possible to build a picture of a candidates technical skills and experience by reading through their CV, but itâs much harder to make an accurate judgement of their softer skills, and really get an understanding of what theyâre looking for by reading words on a screen. Thatâs one of the many reasons our recruiters will always prioritise voice communication over keyboard when building a relationship with their candidates. Plus, the typed word just doesnât capture tone or expression both fundamental elements of effective rapport building. Using your voice, however, injects humanity and personality, whilst ensuring the message youâre trying to get across is clear and understood. And this is all backed up by academic research â" Yale School of Management found that we can assess emotion most accurately when listening to voices, compared to any other form of communication. Talking helps build trust Weâve all been there â" youâve sent a reactive one-line email reply whilst on the go, which, when received at the other end, has been misinterpreted by the recipient completely. Or, due to your mounting inbox, youâre struggling to respond in a timely way to your key stakeholders. These types of situations can easily damage relationships over time, leading colleagues, clients and stakeholders to lose trust in you bit by bit. Interestingly, the speed of our digital response is now perceived as a key indicator of our trustworthiness. So, to put this into real terms, by not responding to an email in a timely manner for example, we could essentially risk signalling to the sender that their request isnât a priority for us, or that we donât perceive it (and inadvertently, them) to be important. And, as the number of emails weâre all receiving continues to rise, the more likely it is that this will happen, and thus trust amongst colleagues, clients and stakeholders will become weaker and weaker over time. How to get your people typing less and talking more Thereâs a fine line between digitalising the way we all work, and encouraging our people to use one of their best human assets, their voices, to do their jobs, and do their jobs well. But, I do think itâs possible to do â" especially if you, as a leader, can start making a concerted effort to do more talking and less typing yourself. So, next time youâre embroiled in an email conversation which is going back and forth and dragging on and on, book a meeting or pick up the phone youâll get the outcome you need far more quickly, whilst ensuring the relationship with the recipient remains intact. Or, when an urgent task pops up which you need to delegate to a member of your team, resist the urge to send an email marked as âhigh importanceâ. Instead brief them face-to-face or give them a call. Once the task has been understood, then is the time to follow up with a confirmation email. And, if you feel telephone calls are too disruptive or you donât have time for a face-to-face meeting, try sending a voice memo instead â" telephones, meetings and video conferencing are not the only ways you can use your voice to communicate. So, youâve come to the end of my blog â" how many phone calls or conversations have you heard in that time? Very few is probably the answer. Instead of voices, you can probably hear the continuous tapping of keyboards. Itâs this that needs to be tackled, before we all forget how to actually talk to each other. After all, itâs our people, and their voices that really power our businesses, and we must ensure the volume gets turned up. You can find more leadership advice from Hays CEO, Alistair Cox below: Do you really know what tomorrows talent will want? 4 reasons employees dont quit, for decades Are you getting these basics wrong?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.